Although Catholicism, Judaism and Islam each have their own religious views on marital agreements, it is clear that each state also has a different view of pre-marital agreements and that the application varies by jurisdiction. Overall, the commonality is that the three religions discussed in this article promote the institution of marriage. Therefore, if a marital agreement is to be tasty in the religious context, it should not promote divorce. A marriage contract in this case could contain more instructions than a will, as well as a much more detailed registration of the assets involved. A marriage agreement is a contract signed by two parties, which determines the distribution of personal property after the end of the marriage. And since the Catholic Church teaches that a sacramental marriage cannot be dissolved, can never stop, then a conjugal agreement is a denial of that truth, right? „… He managed this tension by taking his clients to the church to offer their ring to the needy. You could say that you don`t break up the marriage, you solve what`s already broken. But I certainly had clients to whom I advised to go out if I thought they had been cruelly treated, abused or in a state of intractable misfortune. And I think that was a good thing. The case of a widow and widower who only wants to protect the natural right to inherit children from first marriage can be exceptional. This is clear if the marital agreement provides for the provision of the property provision in the event of death and not divorce. A marital agreement, which offers protection in the event of divorce, may well mean the exclusion of the permanence of marriage and thus the nullity of marriage from a Catholic point of view.
In cases where one party has much more assets than the other and these assets are protected from the future spouse and no third party benefits (. B for example, elderly parents who have spent their lives setting up a family business), it is difficult to see how the couple hears the community of life, the real marriage. Marital agreements are civil, so Catholic canon law does not exclude them in principle. But: „Although the canonical law does not mention the theme of conjugal agreements, the Catholic Church teaches that marriage is the total gift of the spouses to God. Therefore, no string can be added. A marital agreement is a very big string! www.catholic.com/thisrock/quickquestions/category/Marriage/page2 The question is whether a mahr in the United States can be considered a marital agreement. Several jurisdictions have equated a Mahr with a marriage contract, including New Jersey, California and New York. However, unlike a mahr, marital agreements are not negotiated solely to compensate for inequalities in matrimonial law, as described above. A marital agreement is gender neutral, both sexes can agree on property laws to protect their property, while a mahr has been developed exclusively to protect women. As divorce is becoming more common, many engaged couples ask themselves the question: „What if we don`t make it?“ The concern is not always related to the guarantee of financial assets among those who marry from different rich countries. Sometimes a spouse entering into a second marriage wishes to protect the inheritance of his children from the first marriage, and a conjugal agreement may be as relevant to objects of sentimental value as to objects of monetary value. According to the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, although they admit that the use of marriage contracts has become commonplace in recent years, they see such arrangements as a sign of immediate concern in the marriage preparation process.
Despite concerns about marital agreements, the Church does not always discourage them. In some cases, a conjugal agreement may correspond to a Catholic conception of marriage.